The message you're giving out here to any potential contributor to FBA is that their will is going to be ignored, and you simply don't care. You're basically saying the license they submit code to you under does not matter.
That is how you kill a project and get it blacklisted everywhere.
If you're serious about working in the software industry it's the kind of project you can't be seen as contributing to as well as most professional software development studios have VERY strict rules and regulations when it comes to this kind of thing, so showing that you're willing to flout them so flagrantly counts against you. If they associate you in real life with your username, or worse, you've stated you've worked on a project that gets flagged as ignoring licenses in this way then even in real life you can find yourself blacklisted (I've had to help with this very process for a company in the past and people have been rejected simply for working on improperly licensed software) This alone is enough to put off new contributors to your project.
This is not just fun and games, it's a serious business I'm afraid.
You might wonder why this is, but it is absolutely vital to a professional software development studio that their in-house codebases don't become tainted by software that hasn't been properly licensed. The worst thing a developer can do is just lift code from somewhere without looking properly at a license, or be willing to completely ignore it. Cleaning this up can cost hundreds of thousands, enough to bankrupt a small studio several times over, with the cost of cleaning it up multiplying almost exponentially depending on how much further code was based on that tainted code. No reputable company wants to be involved with somebody who has shown a willingness to introduce such issues and ignore them.
One of the issues is that FBA did originally come from when people weren't quite so well informed on software licensing, and if anything you should be working to clean that up, not dismissing the problem.
What you're saying here is highly offensive to those who have tried to work hard to clean up the licensing situation and offer legal alternatives.